28/08/2015 by CMN
While latest Coverage Monitoring Network (CMN) publications have been continually referring to a new Community Assessment and even laid out a solid groundwork for its implementation, very little has been written on how this qualitative research fits within the framework of Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage (SQUEAC), how it differs from previously used methods and, most importantly, what is its added value for coverage assessments of CMAM programming. The development of Community Assessment was inspired by a coincident growing demand and need to investigate more thoroughly on barriers and boosters having an impact on access and coverage of CMAM programmes, which, in consequence, translate into operational recommendations aiming to improve programme’s performance. A thorough review of all coverage assessment reports available to date, coupled with an invaluable feedback from partners, identified a number of gaps in a qualitative data collection of Stage I of a SQUEAC investigation and motivated several months’ worth of meticulous work of designing and field-testing of improved methods and tools. Community Assessment is a result of those efforts, aiming to assist CMAM programmes in exploring in greater depths positive and negative factors influencing decision-making process for access and upkeep of the treatment. In contrast to a standard Stage I of a SQUEAC investigation, Community Assessment aspires to identify under-surface trigger points in community behaviour and thus allow programmes to develop comprehensive remedial strategies addressing core obstacles rather than their external manifestations. Community Assessment could also be labelled as an extended Stage I of a SQUEAC investigation as it makes use of its original methodology but systematizes and expands its scope and qualitative dimension. As such, Community Assessment fits perfectly into a standard SQUEAC investigation timeline and does not entail any implementation obstacles.